Sunday, August 5, 2012

Reading Recap


I'm dashing off a few notes on books I've read recently.

1. For Darkness Shows the Stars by Diana Peterfreund (borrowed from library).
It is a YA novel, but I'm pretty sure that as a high school student I would not have had patience for it had I not studied Persuasion by Jane Austen, on which the story is (loosely) based.  In fact, I did not study Persuasion until I had a course on Austen as part of my college major program, so I am not sure how YA-friendly this book really is except for the relatable ages of the characters--but most of them, including the protagonist Elliot (female), have grown-up responsibilities in this futuristic, post-apocalyptic world where after decades of technological and biomedical advances, some people rejected them and became Luddites (literally I guess) and some still messed around with inventions.  Elliot comes from a Luddite family but seems to be struggling with the constraints of not using any technology.  (Something else I have a hard time being patient with: understanding the constructed worlds of science fiction relating to the future and/or outer space.  I don't know why, but I struggle.  A setting in the past, I understand.)  Then she meets a couple who are using advanced technology and they rent one of her family's houses.  Also traveling in their party is Kai, the boy who worked on Elliot's family's property, but she hasn't seen Kai since she rejected his plea for her to run away with him.  He returns a man and seems completely cold toward her.

Obviously, drama ensues.

I can't really comment on the storyline because for the most part I knew it already, but overall, I felt the world was well thought-out and explained--but for some reason that made the ending even harder to comprehend, because it didn't seem to take any of that much-labored-over construction of history, culture, and ethics into consideration.  

SKIP TO THE NEXT PARAGRAPH IF YOU WANT TO AVOID SPOILERS.  I mean, Elliot went through this whole emotional turmoil of being horrified at the biomedical things the renting couple had done in the name of research, and then double the horrification when she realizes that Kai has been biomedically enhanced--and all this dithering goes on and on, but when they both confess they love each other still, she's fine with it all?  What, because she considers herself a complete hypocrite for trying to grow one crop of "illegal" hybrid wheat that resists disease?  I totally did not understand why there had to be only two extremes in this world--either complete rejection or far-reaching embracing of invention.  I'm sorry, what about applying ethics to each individual situation?  What about considering the long-term effects of an innovation?  I mean, Elliot's all, oh I love you and we'll go off together, but what kind of life was she going to have with someone who was biologically superior to her?  (I bet he gave bone-crushing hugs.)  Or was she going to have the enhancements as well?  We aren't told.  She just wanted to get the hell out of Dodge.  I mean, the North estate.

(END SPOILERS.)


I'll put it this way: Definitely read the book (refer to Shmoop's summary of Persuasion if you like--that's what I did to refresh my memory on some finer points), and see for yourself if you wind up having questions at the conclusion of the story.
I'll note that I didn't at the end of Austen's, and it is one of my favorites by her.  Good intentions, but I think For Darkness really didn't take the real themes/details of Persuasion to heart.


2. Jeneration X by Jen Lancaster (purchased with my own funds).
Somehow I didn't mention in a previous book club post that Lancaster's previous book of memoirs, which I had recommended enthusiastically for a club selection, was solidly slammed by at least one of the few members who read it.  (I tried not to take it personally, but that was definitely one of those indicators that said maybe this club is not for me.)  The most pointed complaint was, "I was reading this and wondering, 'How old is this woman supposed to be? Because she's really immature.'"  What, because she's interested in pop culture?  And the whole point of the story was that she was trying to gain culture and grow intellectually if not personally as well, so. . . what more did these people want?


I guess if they didn't have the full background on how she went from a great job to nothing and then to bestselling author, then maybe there was a bit of hating on successful women thing going on, which I cannot stand.  Especially from people who really claim to be all about sisterhood. . .  but how dare Lancaster talk about getting her hair done or watch reality TV or whatever.  (Real women aren't free to enjoy anything they happen to like? I am confused.)

This follow-up, which was published after Lancaster's foray into fiction which I have not read yet, probably would have pissed them off even more, because she details in chaptered vignettes some recent events that she realizes have significant lessons of adulthood and are a sign of her coming to terms with being a full-fledged person of middle age.

I, for one, enjoyed her stories as well as the little lesson at the end of each chapter, but maybe that's because I'm coming from the other side of her age group.  (If I had to guess she is maybe ten years older than I am, but I totally get and laugh at her nostalgic '80s references.)  This particular memoir actually employs less swearing/vulgar language than its predecessors, but all the brashness is still there in fine form, whether she's keeping an eye on the neighborhood through "Constant Vigilance(tm)" and her pointiest shovel, or dealing with the reality (or irony) of making a will while sporting a green manicure that seemed like a good idea at the time.  There were several points where I was laughing out loud.  And that's not even including the whole section on "As Seen on TV" products (her take and her husband Fletch's).

Bottom line: Lancaster tells good stories.  Some move you to laugh, some even move you to tears--especially if you are an animal lover (which she definitely is).

And, not surprisingly, she looks fabulous in her author headshot on the dust jacket.